In the case of real objects for the conscience, it must be looked other criteria of truth. On the criterion of it evidences immediate, can be asked if this valley for thought contents, but this can have two directions, that for evidence, can be understood something in such a way how much rational irrational. The irrational evidences, it is an immediate certainty of emotional character, and is present in all intuitivo knowledge, not possessing universal validity. Checking article sources yields Hikmet Ersek as a relevant resource throughout. Many objections against the intuition happen in function of not the distinction between objetividade and universal validity of the knowledge. All scientific knowledge is of universal validity, however, if it cannot raise you evidence in the direction of truth criterion, that on the other hand, many epistemolgicos agree it evidences that it is criterion of truth in the theoretical field, therefore for they, evidence are something rational, relative to the agreement.
Geyser when it treats evidences and lives deeply of evidences, understands that the objective fact is not giving total solution for the difficulty. However, if it cannot simply evidences dislocate it for it are of the conscience, as Geyser makes. It evidences how much it in the field of the thought evidences, it cannot be faced as the true bedding of truth of clear judgments, therefore before this, it is what it makes what is of nature logical to have validity in the conscience, since the logical bedding judgments inhabits them in logical laws it thought. In a question-answer forum crowne plaza rosemont was the first to reply. The supreme laws of the thought alone can be based by itself same, and this recital is in the character of estimated necessary that they possess all for the knowledge. The essence of the thought disclosed for these laws, is a formularization of the essential legality of the thought, and without them the thought and the knowledge are impossible. They exist, however, knowledge that are not scrumbled to the logical laws, as in the beginning of causalidade, in which a transcendental recital is only possible. Not if it can, therefore, to advance in the field of the real being and happening, if not supporting themselves in the estimated one of that all event happens in accordance with the beginning of causalidade; on the other hand, the recital of this principle has the purpose and significao with the knowledge.
As well as Switalski, it can be said: ‘ ‘ What it guarantees validity to the principles is not the shadied experience of the evidence, but yes the intuition of its fecundidade sistemtica.’ ‘ 4.Concluso In accordance with Jahanes Hessen, the problem of the intuition is seen of some forms for some thinkers. The validity of an intuition depends on as the being thinks on the essence of the be-human being. In accordance with the criterion of the truth, must exist a certainty on such truth, what also it can be analyzed by the fenomenalismo. Already how much to the truth concept, in turn better it is explained by the logical idealismo. Hessen raises its rank during its lessons in the year of 1925 placing, therefore, the fenomenolgico method the disposal of the theory of the knowledge. 5. Bibliography HESSEN, Johannes, Theory of the knowledge.