Thus, it would be the result of a deep evolution, decanted throughout thousand of years, basically similar to all, and if the moralistas theories show the opposite, them must be changed. Millions of future years could only change the Nature human being, you are welcome advancing the speeches, the governments, the laws and the revolutions. ' ' man novo' ' , of this form, would be only one way decorated for good intentions, that would lead to the hell. II For an order question. To refute the ideas of Mostern does not offer intellectual requirements of transport. Preliminarily, she is necessary to remember that the man is a natural being, that is, is integrant part of the Nature.
If it cannot conceive the set of it without in it inserting the species human being. However, at the same time where if he constitutes in being natural, the man if differentiates of the Nature in its inorgnico body. It acts on the Nature to give account of its necessities, and its action only is not biological determined but if of, mainly, for the incorporation of experiences and knowledge produced and transmitted of generation the generation, by means of the education and of the culture. This allows the new generations not to come back to the starting point. In this process, it develops ideas, knowledge, values, beliefs. Being the process of production of the existence human being a social process, is the economic base that it determines the forms politics, legal and the set of the ideas that exist in each society. It is the transformation of this material base, to soon of the time, that it determines all society, implying new models of production, therefore, new definitive social relations, happened from there a new ideology. In the tribal, communal societies, the social group organized for sex and age to produce and to reproduce the necessary goods to the survival.