In Under these standards can be and guidelines, in the presence of what these recommendations are written. Looks very ugly situation when there is a self-regulatory organizations that do not regulate, there is The National Council, which also had not prepared a single technique – "federal" standard. And everything up to the professional assessment of the evaluation reports are governed by bureaucratic regulations, which have administrative procedures, but there are no professional procedures (methods). 3. It should be noted that under Russian law there are at least four meanings for the word "expertise": 1) the legal concept of expertise, 2) "Expertise" as a non-departmental inspection, 3) "expertise" as a procedural investigation, 3) "independent examination" as vneprotsessualnoe study. In addition, in the public mind there is the concept of "expert" as anyone who knows something and can make subjective judgments. Unfortunately, sometimes, not burdened by knowledge of the law experts and officials have used the word "expert" in the latter sense.
It should also be to distinguish between "expert" in the process of legally significant interaction between subjects of law, administrative process involving the executive authorities and the judicial process. As part of the trial appointed forensic evaluation, rather than "examination" of the evaluation report 5. The Act only once mentions the phrase "expertise of the evaluation report," in particular "Expert advice SRO provides the expertise of appraisers reporting of securities, as well as the expertise of other kinds of reports of appraisers in accordance with the laws of the Russian Federation. " Such scant regulation of the institution examination, but its ubiquitous references to laws, characteristic of modern Russian lawmakers. This fact has led to the norms related to this examination are prone to corruption, and the market is not regulated by law prone to corruption expertise in the hundreds of billion. In this department against the Constitution and principles of law are trying to circumvent the law to assert their own constitutive norms concerning rights and responsibilities of experts and the most expert activities.