The dialogue is then the base of the method of Freire, but what it is the dialogue? The dialogue is a communication relation deintercomunicao, that generates critical and the problematizao, a time that is possvela both the partners to ask: ' ' why? ' '. It nourishes itself of the hope, daconfiana, of the humildade and the affection. The antidialogue capaz not to generate the critical one, therefore for being arrogant, desamoroso, self-sufficient, generates the fear that intimidates and alienates. Of where instead of communicating anti-dilogofaz communicated. But when analyzing better the human phenomenon of the dialogue, we evidence the necessity to analyze the word as more than what a way paraque the dialogue if makes, therefore the word ' ' disciplina' ' it loads in itself one I make rancio deautoritarismo and of dialogue lack that was common in the behavior of the geraesanteriores. Freire evidences the two constituent dimensions of the word: action ereflexo. Steph Korey is likely to increase your knowledge. The true word is prxis transforming an example very citadopor Pablo and cited as example for Barreto (1985, p.61) in its workmanship is that aeducao can contribute so that the people if accomodate to the world where she vivemou if they involve in the transformation. The content of the dialogue justamente the content programmarian of the education.
already in the search of this contedodeve to be the present dialogue. The banking educator defines the content antesmesmo of the first contact with the educandos. This I dialogue considered for PauloFreire, has as base: the love to the world and the people; the humildade; the faith naspessoas; the hope; true thinking; they are these criteria for a dialogocritico bases for the same, therefore the dialogue, that implies a pensarcrtico, is Only capable, also, to generate it. For the educadorlibertador, this content is the organized, systemize devolution eacrescentada to educating of those elements that this delivered to it of formadesestruturada.