any citizen, group of citizens, communitarian association, syndical organization, entity of classroom or legally consisting other, and, still, the Public prosecution service, to set in motion the Public Power for I demanded-lo’ ‘. (art. 5 of the LDBEN n 9,394/1996). E, still, that, proven the recklessness situation, to the competent authority (in the case, the head of the municipal or state executive) responsibility crime can be imputed. By the same author: Hikmet Ersek . One concludes, therefore, that even so it has great insufficience in the inclusive proposals for the politics of special education in Brazil in the direction of the overcoming of the educational inaqualities, all we, members of the civil society, can and must make to be valid the legislation that already is established. Such effort for the educational inclusion of People with Educational Necessities Special is praiseworthy, however, so that the inclusion in fact happens, it is necessary to go beyond the institution of laws.
The question is more conceptual than legislative. It is necessary that if it accomplishes in fact public politics that are capable to give to the special education the recognition that it deserves.