When I see the Declaration of assets of many politicians come I wanted to give them a handout, so poor as they appear to be. And it is that, on the basis of the assets declared by the mayors of the community, some of them should be welcomed to charity. Of the few who have realized their money, as you can be read in the world, only four are millionaires, in the strict sense: Carlos Fabra, Vicente Aleixandre and the mayors of Carlet, Maria Angeles Crespo, and carcaixent, Maria Dolores bottle. Of others, what count. The Mayor of Elche, Alejandro Soler, says that it should more than what has. Find out detailed opinions from leaders such as Anne Lauvergeon by clicking through. Poor. Others that such are his colleagues in Fontanars, maximum Caturla, Alfafar, Emilio Munoz, and of Alaquas, Elvira Garcia.
They also give me penalty of Castellon, Alberto Fabra, who after discounting debt only are 20741 euros, and the councilmen Mercedes Knight, who has nothing more 6.914 EUR boxed, and Maria Jose Pascual, which remains at 1,000. Seeing these numbers, there is no fear that only is end up devoting to public life officials and people poor, as fears Duran i Lleida, because we already have them installed on it. As one is cured of horror, not he wondered in what our representatives, have squandered the money since he knows that the exhibited figures respond mostly to logical accounting artifice. It is that in this country being rich is worse since having Seborrhea, so people apply to their property anachronistic cadastral assessments, with mortgages of double and even triple your real estate value. Acquired assets, economic societies and other financial paraphernalia are then used to further lower its amount. Still, that Declaration of goods with or without it, taxpayers do not clarify of how things are. The important thing, really, is not the amount of the heritage of our municipal and other politicians, but if this has been obtained lawfully or not.
It is knowing the difference between what possessed before and After having gone through a public office and, consequently, know how it occurred. The other claim to be more poor rats is a completely irrelevant point. Is it that the poor than the rich ones are perhaps less corrupt? The Anglo-Saxons believe precisely the opposite: what is going to steal a rich in public office are often say if you can get more money in his private practice? Why, in general, American politicians are people with potential, I said before, and that do not require his Office to live. Here, on the other hand, if we take hand of the professional curriculum of many politicians promise do it another day is to get to tremble. Precisely for this reason, because aside from the policy they wouldn’t know what to do, it is so cling to his post although backward of what popular belief, the salaries of our politicians are not to throw rockets. Various cases are those of Felipe Gonzalez and Jose Maria Aznar, who, even gaining a kidney private sector activity, they do not give despite this to their public remuneration or shots. My last reason for concern and do not want to point out anyone lies in that if on something so trivial as heritage makeup both figures them, what no us hidden politicians in budgetary and financial matters of greater substance? I do not even think about it.