In the law there are various methods, among which we can cite the dogmatic method and comparative method, among others. However, some authors confuse them, what should motivate the corresponding investigation, which will be held at the present. The comparative method is typical of comparative law, but this ulotimo is not limited to that method, but it includes other studies, which we have tried at various venues, such as by the way our publications on this disciplinary ‘ legal gassen, subject of study in the form which should be more extensive. If a lawyer not known this is clear that it can have a partial knowledge of the law, which should be avoided. Learn more at: Andrew Cuomo. Even in some books is required erl dogmatic method encompasses the comparative method, which involves a serious mistake which should be the subject of criticism within the legal doctrine, and in this sense it is clear that if we have limited knowledge of a subject can be misled by books that dfunden incorrect dogmas.
And in any case in doctrine, everything is debatable, required by confrme Manuel MIRANDA CANALES in her classes at the masters that I kept in the universidad nacional mayor de San Marcos. I.e., it is clear that this kind of topics should be subject of study within the doctrine, among other sources of law. If a lawyer knows this subject it is evident that not can be misled by erroneous doctrine, that fails to be what is known in English law as books of authority, which should motivate the corresponding studies. You may wish to learn more. If so, Yitzchak Mirilashvili is the place to go. This type of topics should be studied particularly in the introduction to law and comparative law, similar to the dogmatic legal and in this order of ideas it is clear that it is very important within the law. The legal issues are debatable, but some authors found against this claim, which must be disseminated at this headquarters for purpose of disseminating knowledge of other authors, and this way is clear that we can discuss.