Judiciary Institutions

Almost twenty years ago when I was studying the fourth or fifth semester of law degree for the first time I became aware of what is, in practice the judiciary, its social function and their integration. Since then I noticed that both state and federal level, a constant concern to the agencies involved in the said public authority, is working on the backlog. More than ten years, twenty to I go back, I worked on Judiciary, whether local or federal, for what I have been witness to the actions institutionally implemented with the intention of a resolver the problem , including others, organizational adjustments have been made, modern systems have been implemented in line with technological changes, has increased the number of courts, there have been reforms to the laws; and even has driven the transition from writing to a oral system, however, after the time sadly see that the situation in really has not changed, the Judiciary, but mainly the courts, continue to have the same problem, then I wonder, are condemned to live with the problem of backlog work?

If are the causes of the problem? An important aspect that I noticed is that the holders of the courts, immersed in the main function of their role, which undoubtedly is the judicial function, they forget completely the administrative aspect of the presiding body, and that is where I tabled my question:

And why the owner of a court of the judiciary, should be given the resources and procedures that influence and shape the process of administration of justice? In the introductory message of the respective code a tica, I found that a the Federal Judicial Branch is responsible for defending the constitutional order and to ensure that, in conflict, justice is done.